Worksheet 3: Reasons for Owning a Family Owned Forest

Table 1:  Area and number of family owned forests in the United States* by reason for owning forest land, 2006. The numbers include landowners who ranked each objective as very important (1) or important (2) on a seven-point scale where 1 is very important and 7 is least important.

Reason Area in Acres (thousands) Area (percent) Number of Ownerships (thousands) Ownership (percent)
Aesthetic 158,447 63.6 7,152 70.2
Nature Protection 128,198 51.5 5,494 53.9
Land Investment 116,707 46.9 3,807 37.4
Part of home or cabin ** 127,817 51.3 6,609 64.9
Part of farm 100,394 40.3 2,809 27.6
Privacy 134,039 53.8 6,349 62.3
Family Legacy 148,982 59.8 4,919 48.3
Non-timber forest products 25,014 10.0 756 7.4
Firewood production 37,139 14.9 1,293 12.7
Timber Production 78,085 31.4 1,020 10.0
Hunting or Fishing 108,556 43.6 2,645 26.0
 Other Recreation 84,107 33.8 2,912 28.6
 No Answer 2,906 1.2 119 1.2

* Numbers above are for the continental U.S. and exclude interior Alaska , Hawaii , Nevada , western Texas , and western Oklahoma.
** Includes primary and secondary residences.
This table comes from the USDA Forest Service, National Woodland Owner Survey and are draft figures. Designed for review purposes only.

  1. Create a bar graph for 2006 showing the reason for owning land compared to the amount of land owned for that reason.
  2. Create a second bar graph for 2006 showing the reason for owning land compared to the percentage of owners owning land for that reason.
  3. Using the worksheet 3 chart and your graphs, what are the top three reasons that people gave for owning family owned forests in 2006?
  4. Using the worksheet 3 chart and your graph, what are the three reasons given that had the largest amounts of forestland (acres in thousands) in 2006?
  5. Were you surprised by these graphs? Would you like own private forestland? Why?
  6. A similar survey was given in 1993; however, forestland owners were only given the following choices: aesthetic, land investment, part of farm or home, family legacy, timber production, recreation, and no answer. What “reason” choice changes were made to the 2006 survey? Why do you think they might have added these new options?